My opinion is neutral.Designers must stop this thing because as years go by,pokemon will be becoming more ''unknown'' in comparison with the first ones that we really liked and were famous (because they were the first ones)But,if pokemon stop now,players will be forced to play all the time the old versions and always battle with the same pokemon of the dex.Unfortunately,they will stop being created in some years.....
So,we must get used to playing both old versions and new even if we don't like this event,unfortunately.
I want pokemon to proceed,but not become ''unknown''.Is that easy to happen?The answer is:no.
I don't know...The first answer when I think about it that comes to my mind is 'yes',but I just find it really repeatitive...I enjoy playing a new game that is an old one but freshened,but I think that Nintendo really can't keep at it,even if they wan to.Imo they're running out of ideas...It's logical,even for the most brilliant minds in game history.
Yeah,they are definitely running out of ideas.The design of the new Rotom forms prove that.
I have voted yes because it will be boring if it will not have some new pokemon
I want more generations to catch every pokemon easier
IDK, Nintendo's originality appears to be failing with the new Rotom forms, but it could just be them breaking in some 22-year-olds fresh out of college.
I voted no because you will have to spend more money to complete the pokedex. For example, in the case of jirachi and, celebi and mew and darkrai as well as shaymin, you either need to buy a gamecube and pokemon collosium or go to a nintendo event located in other countries. Or you could buy an action replay but codes for those pokemon are rare, and most dont work anyway. Back to my point. They would probably make another game system and you would have to buy yet another one to complete the pokedex. And besides, they already have 493 pokemon in D/P not including the deoixys forms and similarities, and you need to trade from FR/LG to platinum which is very time consuming. Nintendo has gone far enough. They have made too many pokemon games. Also, look at this-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orpgUPNSRPI .Interesting, isnt it? Back to the main topic... again.
....
Howerve, i do hope Nintendo makes 2 last pokemon games. 1st, a pokemon game that has all the reigons in it and even has places like faraway island or birth island without an action replay or Nintendo Event. You could complete the entire pokedex with that one game. 2nd, it would be cool if they made a reproduction of that game in 3-D. You would walk around and battle with 360 degrees of eviroment. You could actualy adventuer around like normal yet battle in a whole new way. Sorry for the long post.
I think that i have bored pokemon already....but i steel play with them!!!
yes as long as they keeep making new pokemon
I believe that they should work with what they have first. Further down the line they could start making new pokemon but it may be best if they take a break first. I think the Rotom forms are interesting, what do you expect from a pokemon that's known to possess electronic devices (though a robot would have been nice...)?
They should make more generations!
Because a lot of children want to play Pokemon....
If more generations mean more Pokemon so as to not see the same ones in each and every team,it's OK.If it means worse Pokemon,made because the think the more the better,then no.And they should add more things in the games.
more more more and more!!!!!!!! the more the merrier and they just keep getting better.
I relly want more generations!!! 
i love pokemon. But i think that if we have more generations we must something very new like strange places, more for Wi-Fi connection. Wi-Fi tournaments in all over the world and more